diff options
author | romkatv <roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com> | 2019-10-03 23:15:30 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | romkatv <roman.perepelitsa@gmail.com> | 2019-10-03 23:15:30 +0300 |
commit | 6f11dca7d36415479ff26c7e37efed83dc13df9e (patch) | |
tree | 3739a45f12ab34e261ee6ab11115866558640fa1 /README.md | |
parent | c0cb09991e887c01d01651bf35474b5b794be8f8 (diff) |
update loading time benchmarks
Diffstat (limited to 'README.md')
-rw-r--r-- | README.md | 10 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 6 deletions
@@ -262,9 +262,8 @@ prompt latency when using Powerlevel10k, please ### Is Powerlevel10k fast to load? -The amount of time it takes for Powerlevel10k to render the first prompt is singnificantly higher -than for the subsequent prompts. In comparison to other ZSH themes, Powerlevel10k loading latency -is unremarkable. Powerlevel10k is neither fast nor slow to load. +The amount of time it takes for Powerlevel10k to render the first prompt is higher than for the +subsequent prompts but it's still fairly fast. Time to first prompt can be measured with the following benchmark: @@ -272,13 +271,12 @@ Time to first prompt can be measured with the following benchmark: time (repeat 100 zsh -dfis <<< 'source ~/powerlevel10k/powerlevel10k.zsh-theme') ``` -On the same machine as in the [prompt benchmark](#is-it-really-fast) this results in 59.7 ms per +On the same machine as in the [prompt benchmark](#is-it-really-fast) this results in 36.9 ms per invocation when executed in a small git repository (I used the `powerlevel10k` repo itself). For comparison, the same benchmark gives 171 ms for powerlevel9k/master and 505 ms for powerlevel9k/next. -*Note: Powerlevel10k startup latency can be reduced by about 15% by compiling its source files with -`zcompile`.* +*Note: Powerlevel10k is significantly faster to load with zsh version 5.4 and above.* ### Does Powerlevel10k always render exactly the same prompt as Powerlevel9k given the same config? |